SC frowns on ‘Chicken’s Neck’ speech; Sharjeel says could’ve worded it better
The Supreme Court heard arguments regarding Sharjeel Imam's alleged inflammatory speeches. While the court deemed his call to block the Siliguri Corridor objectionable, his lawyer highlighted his appeals for peaceful protest and non-violence. The defense argued there is no credible evidence against Imam, and he was not involved in the riots.
The Supreme Court heard arguments regarding Sharjeel Imam's alleged inflammatory speeches. While the court deemed his call to block the Siliguri Corridor objectionable, his lawyer highlighted his appeals for peaceful protest and non-violence. The defense argued there is no credible evidence against Imam, and he was not involved in the riots.
